<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Freelance Historian &#187; Pickering</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.freelancehistorian.com/tag/pickering/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.freelancehistorian.com</link>
	<description>The World of Historical Manuscripts and Ephemera</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 18:48:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Why Good Research Matters</title>
		<link>http://www.freelancehistorian.com/2009/10/why-good-research-matters/</link>
		<comments>http://www.freelancehistorian.com/2009/10/why-good-research-matters/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 22:16:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Steven</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Shop Talk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Auction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bloopers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pickering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.freelancehistorian.com/?p=95</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here&#8217;s an example of why the quality of your research (and researchers) makes a difference. While browsing a recent auction at a noted auction house, I came across the following: Timothy Pickering Autograph Letter Signed &#8220;T. Pickering&#8221; as secretary of state. One page, 9.75&#8243; x 8&#8243;, January 10, 1799, n.p. The letter, addressed to Dwight [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s an example of why the quality of your research (and researchers) makes a difference.</p>
<p>While browsing a recent auction at a noted auction house, I came across the following:</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>Timothy Pickering Autograph Letter Signed </strong>&#8220;<em>T. Pickering</em>&#8221; as secretary of state<strong>. </strong>One page, 9.75&#8243; x 8&#8243;, January 10, 1799, n.p. The letter, addressed to Dwight Foster, asks, &#8220;<em>Have you got the </em>Bridget<em>?</em> <em>- Please let me know by the </em>Beaver.&#8221; Both the <em>Beaver</em> and the <em>Bridget</em> were undoubtedly ships. At the time Pickering was involved in procuring ships for the United States Revenue Cutter Service to limit smuggling. Folds and wax seal marks, else fine. Estimate: $400 &#8211; $600.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;">
<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 361px"><a href="http://www.freelancehistorian.com/images/bridgetbeaver1.jpg"><img class=" " title="Listing on Heritage website" src="http://www.freelancehistorian.com/images/bridgetbeaver1.jpg" alt="Screen shot of listing at Heritage" width="351" height="222" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Screen shot of listing</p></div></blockquote>
<p>Now, aside from the fact that the Secretary of State wouldn&#8217;t likely be out buying ships for the Treasury Department (the US Revenue Cutter Service was started by Secretary of the Treasury Alexander Hamilton in 1790,) it took ninety seconds of research to determine that the recipient of this letter is Congressman Dwight Foster of Massachusetts, Chairman of the House Committee on Claims, thereby illuminating the correct reading of the letter:</p>
<p>&#8220;Have you got the <em>Budget?</em> Please let me know by the <em>Bearer</em> (of this letter)&#8221;</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">
<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 351px"><a href="http://www.freelancehistorian.com/images/bridgetbeaver2.jpg"><img class=" " title="Bridget and Beaver" src="http://www.freelancehistorian.com/images/bridgetbeaver2.jpg" alt="Scan of letter from heritage website" width="341" height="215" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Scan of letter from auction website (click for full size)</p></div>
<p style="text-align: left;">Pickering was known for his strong pro-British sympathies, and was negotiating with Britain regarding the claims of Loyalists who lost property when run out of the Colonies during the Revolutionary War.  He is writing Foster, who as Chairman on the Committee on Claims, has finalized the budget for settling this year&#8217;s claims.  Coincidentally, the closest Pickering came to involvement with the US Revenue Cutter Service was having a cutter named for him since he was Secretary of State at the time it was built.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">Unsurprisingly, the letter did not sell.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.freelancehistorian.com/2009/10/why-good-research-matters/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

